🔗 Share this article

Russia's monetary authority has declared it is claiming damages valued at $230 billion against the financial institution Euroclear. This action constitutes a clear warning by the Kremlin regarding plans to utilize frozen Russian state assets to aid Ukraine.

The Financial Lawsuit

Based on reports in local state media, the monetary authority initiated a claim last week for roughly 18 trillion roubles. This sum is equivalent to the stated $230 billion demand.

EU leaders are set to determine in the coming days regarding a plan to leverage around €210 billion in frozen Russian assets. The proposal entails granting Ukraine with a substantial loan to fund its military and economic needs.

The vast majority of these funds, amounting to €185 billion, reside at the Euroclear depository in Brussels. This institution acts as the main custodian for the Kremlin's immobilised sovereign wealth.

A Clash Over Legality

EU officials have argued that their plan is legally sound. Their position rests on the principle that ownership of the state assets still belongs to Russia, even though it was frozen in EU jurisdictions shortly after the full-scale invasion of Ukraine.

The Russian government, however, has called any utilization of the funds as illegal appropriation. It has warned of retaliatory measures, such as confiscating EU corporate holdings within Russia.

The head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, who has assumed a prominent position in peace negotiations, wrote on a social media platform that Russia "will win in court" and retrieve its assets. He warned that the EU, the common currency, and Euroclear "will face consequences" from the proposal.

Wider Implications

In comments interpreted as an effort to drive a wedge between Europe and the United States, Dmitriev characterized the proposal as "a severe assault on the right to ownership and the global financial system established by the United States."

Euroclear declined to provide a statement on the latest lawsuit. It has previously noted it is facing more than 100 legal cases in Russian courts.

Enforcement Challenges

Although courts in European nations are not expected to recognize rulings from Russian tribunals, experts anticipate Moscow to seek implementation in nations with stronger relations to the Kremlin.

"The Bank of Russia may attempt to enforce a Russian court's decision against Euroclear in jurisdictions like China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other friendly states, provided that relevant holdings can be located," commented a legal expert from an international firm.

EU Countermeasures

European authorities said they are working on steps to discourage other nations from aiding any Russian legal action against EU entities. Additionally, they are designing protections to protect EU member states with investments in Russia from what they call "unlawful expropriation."

The Proposed Loan Mechanism

Under the complex scheme, the EU would issue an first €90 billion loan to Ukraine, backed by the proceeds generated from the frozen assets at Euroclear. Critically, Russia's legal claim on the principal funds would stay unaffected.

Ukraine would only be required to return the money if and when Russia agreed to pay reparations for the immense damage caused during the nearly four-year conflict.

Alternative Proposals

The Belgian government, backed by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has asked the EU to examine an different approach for financing Ukraine. This involves common EU debt issuance to secure a loan, backed by unused funds within the European budget.

This alternative move, however, demands full agreement among all 27 EU countries. Hungary's government, considered friendly with the Kremlin, has already signaled its opposition.

Commenting on Monday, the EU foreign policy chief, a senior official, described the reparations loan as "the most credible solution" for supporting Ukraine. "The reparations loan is secured against the Russian immobilized funds, meaning it doesn't come from our taxpayers' money, which is equally important," she remarked. "Furthermore, it delivers a clear message that when you do all this destruction to another nation, you must pay for the reparations."